Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Week 2 Courbet

Not only is the subjects ones that could be seen any day of the week Courbet forced the viewer to confront hardships of life which they would gladly turn away from. It is for this reason that this realist was such a thorn in the side of the bourgeoisie. At a time when the people of France were fighting for their independence the ruling class was being forced to take a clear look at life in its purest form.
The Stone Breakers depicts a task that by the differences of the men’s clothing shows that it has been going on for a very long time and will not stop soon. The older man seems to depict how from the beginning he has worked a hard job for little pay and less recognition. The younger man is new to this life. His clothing shows that he once had a higher paying job and could afford finer things. The job of providing stone dust for roads was hard labor and no man wanted to have it or pay attention to those that did.
The Burial at Ornans depicts the burial of a revolutionary and although the book refers to it as a homage to his maternal grandfather it seems to respect the deaths of all revolutionaries. The inclusion of a portrait of the man when he was alive seemingly in attendance of his own funeral surrounded by the clergy whom seem not to care shows how little the revolution to meant to the rich and wealthy. This burial is better attended by the men closest to the grave as it seems they are the only ones who care and are willing to give their lives just as quickly.
These paintings speak of everyday life amongst the poorest and yet most willing to fight for their freedom.  They force the government to take a close and clear look at how they treat the people they rule. Realism is a recording of everyday events through the eye of the artist whom lives them. The bourgeoisie would have rather lived in their world of ease and wealth without having to acknowledge the suffering around them. 

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Avant-garde





Avant-garde seems to mean that something is new, different from the expected, and pays little attention to how smooth the texture is expected to be. In the documentary clips it was very important to how the work by Manet the "Luncheon on the Grass" was received by the public and also a huge reason that he became the sensation that he was in the art world. This time consuming work of complete contradictions seems to make the viewer the main character in the work. 
For the first time the painting did not have to tell as story historical or imagined. This is a huge challenge to the viewer. Suddenly they are part of the work and have to make up the story line for themselves. By focusing on the rough strokes, varied gazes of the men, the woman doing something in the water, a picnic that does not seem to be complete or edible by the group. What stands out in the painting is the nude woman whom stares boldly at the viewer. This grouping does not go together but seems rather to invoke an inner perspective of the viewer.
In basics Manet broke all the rules of the time and he kept breaking them. This is what made him and his work avant-garde.

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Art 237 First Blog

Hi everyone,
I hope you had a great spring quarter. Look forward to class with you and reading your blogs.
Joy